home books e-books audio books recent titles with blogs
Could Anglicans be a little more brave about psychic research?

Posted on 23 October 2014, 9:30

Anyone familiar with White Crow Books, Victor Zammit’s weekly newsletter, or this month’s The Ground of Faith will find compelling witnesses to the reality of the spiritual dimension, to a Spirit that is in all, through all, and above all, as described in the New Testament. The evidence has been available for many years, yet officially at least the churches are almost entirely silent about it. Some churches even decry such evidence as “Satanic.”

Because of many personal experiences, I felt motivated to try and draw the attention of clergy in the Anglican Church (and others) to this wonderful and confirming body of knowledge, and so established The Ground of Faith. I emailed invitations to read this journal to between four and five thousand Anglican clergyman in the US, UK, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand.  There were indeed many hundreds who asked not to receive further notifications, including several bishops, yet eleven years later 40 bishops and perhaps 2,000 other clergy are still accepting reminders that the next issue can now be read.  3-4,000 individuals visit our website each month, reading up to 10,000 articles; most of these individuals live in the US, Ukraine, China, France and Germany. Fewer in the UK. The readership now is much wider than the Anglican Church.  Only a small proportion read the journal at depth. Whatever the details, at least it suggests that the bulk of Anglican clergy are not hostile to what are now termed “consciousness studies” (which includes psychic research.)

I can only speak from personal experience, so at the risk of boring those who have heard this story before, I repeat it. In my Afterlife Teaching from Stephen the Martyr I give an account of 200 conversations with the spirit of that Stephen, through Thomas Ashman, a London Jew, as trance medium. He had not trained as a medium, but Stephen apparently first began speaking through Thomas while he was asleep. In my book I provide irrefutable evidence of Stephen’s identity. Now one might imagine that if I went to an Anglican bishop with a story like this, I would have had a hard time. In actual fact, one English bishop and one in New Zealand were prepared to write favourable reviews of the book. Two other English bishops have been supportive. Another bishop asked me why I thought I was involved with Stephen. I replied that it had something to do with reincarnation and soul groups. The response was that early Christians certainly believed in that. As long as the experience brought me closer to God, and made my prayers more real, then the experience was to be trusted, was the response.

Other clergy and academics have been supportive, and prepared to act as consultants for The Ground of Faith, even though aware of my weaknesses and limitations, as well as strengths. So it is really nonsense to say that “the Church as such is against psychic research.”  I think the problem is that in a Community of Faith such as a Church, there are people of all stages of spiritual development, political views, and views on theology. To have a church driven by arguments between opposing views, would destroy fellowship and worship, and hinder the growth of love and mutual support.. and support for the community. Therefore church leaders often avoid controversial topics in public, and are cautious in private. Furthermore few people change their views because they are told to, and a wise priest will respectfully and supportively listen, and try to respond constructively. Confrontation and argument are not helpful to communion with God and neighbour, and with openness to Spirit.

All the above suggests that to some extent, with the journal, I may be knocking on an open door at least so far as many in the Anglican Church are concerned. But it will also be true to say that many church leaders and members are strongly influenced by the dominant Materialist prejudice of Western culture, while in contrast there are those who believe that there is no truth other than words to be found in the Bible. Over recent years the voices of the latter have been heard ever more loudly.

With reference to the Stephen book, the Rt. Rev. Edward Holland (Formerly Assistant Bishop of Europe, and then Bishop of Colchester) wrote:
“– I have been very affected by it.  What comes to mind immediately is:  1. the sense of life after death being very close, very normal and not very intimidating;  2. Stephen’s experience of being at first after his death very tied up with his identity as Stephen but later leaving that behind and only picking it up again in order to communicate with Thomas and the others;  3. the way in which individuality becomes much less important but that nevertheless the ‘ego’ is not something to be avoided but something which contributes to this experience of being part of the whole.” . . . . .

“It has to be said that most people do not really believe in God at a rational level, though probably most do at an emotional level.  This is why almost everyone fumbles over the resurrection of Jesus.  For most it’s an impossibility. What Stephen confirms for me is that it is an entirely natural event, which if only they believed should surprise no one.  As Metropolitan Anthony Bloom, the great Russian Orthodox leader in this country who died a year or so ago said -  I paraphrase him:  ‘How strange to believe that life can die and not believe that life can live!’ “

It was good of Bishop Holland to write this, and it underlines the need for not only the Anglicans, but everyone, to come to grips with the vast body of evidence for the world of Spirit.

In 1937 Archbishops of Canterbury and York of the Church of England appointed a committee to investigate Spiritualism which carefully studied the subject for two years and handed in its report. It was expected by the Committee and by the general public that the guidance contained therein would be made available to the rank and file of the Church of England who, up to them, had been given no official lead whatsoever regarding communication with the dead.( Here is the full text of the report.) But, perhaps out of fear of controversy, the report was shelved.

As I read the report I find myself agreeing with many of the cautions expressed in it. “It is pointed out, on the evidence of the “communicators” themselves, that the communicators and guides are themselves at very different levels of spiritual development and of very partial knowledge, and that the “controls” of which they make use may often be very undeveloped personalities.”

“It seems necessary to distinguish between the sense of contact with departed friends or with “guides”, and the assurance that messages have necessarily any high value because they come through this unusual channel”.

The report is lengthy and a little repetitive, but basically it accepts that communication with the “dead” is real, and often helpful, but adds several cautions, with which I agree.  I add now one final quote:

“There is no reason why we should not accept gladly the assurance that we are still in closest contact with those who have been dear to us in this life, who are going forward, as we seek to do ourselves, in the understanding and fulfilment of the purpose of God.

“We cannot avoid the impression that a great deal of Spiritualism as organised has its centre in man rather than God, and is, indeed, materialistic in character. To this extent it is a substitute for religion, and is not in itself religious at all.

“We are impressed by the unsatisfactory answers received from practising Spiritualists to such questions as, “Has your prayer life, your sense of God, been strengthened by your Spiritualistic experiences?” This explains in great part the hesitancy of many Christians to have anything to do with it.

“But if Spiritualism does, in fact, make so strong an appeal to some, it is at least in part because the Church has not proclaimed and practised its faith with sufficient conviction.”

I think there can be several reasons why we in the church don’t preach our faith with sufficient conviction:

We can lack sufficient experience of the spiritual dimension.

We can fear rejection from fellow Christians who are deeply suspicious of anything that is “unbiblical”, “Satanic” and so forth.

The greater fear however is that a Materialist academic “establishment” will seek to discredit us, and if we belong to Academia, deprive us of funding, status, jobs, and so on. This is very real for “middle class” Anglicans, who tend to predominate in Anglican churches. So strong is academic prejudice, so widespread its influence that to be interested in Spirit is to be far from being respectable in polite society.

I feel this fear myself, and hesitate to name people who support me, fearing to damage their reputations. I fear this even though I am retired and therefore cannot lose my job. Two university professors checked my research with regard to the authenticity of the dialectal Greek spoken by the spirit of Stephen the Martyr. A leader of a branch of the Skeptics was persuaded by my studies and actually published my book. I do name these people in my book, but not otherwise. I am afraid of hurting them.
All this in spite of an ever increasing huge literature providing more and more evidence that Materialism is bankrupt and has no scientific basis.

So that is why I entitled this blog: “Could Anglicans be a little more brave about psychic research?”

We should be braver for the good of humanity.  We should be braver because the philosophy of Materialism is in the process of being discredited.  Recently I attended a lecture conducted by a member of the Skeptics. He was remarking on how laughable so many Nobel Prize winning physicists were and how they were saying cooky things about an imagined spiritual dimension.  But the fact is that 40% of scientists are not Materialists, but have to be careful in what they say, to protect their jobs.  But when you become a Noble Prize-winner, you become a bit harder to sack. In any case, the Skeptic was acknowledging threats on the horizon.

Let us be strong in our faith, acquaint ourselves with trustworthy witnesses to the world of Spirit, and share such trustworthy witness with others.

Michael Cocks edits the journal, The Ground of Faith.
Afterlife Teaching From Stephen the Martyr by Michael Cocks is published by White Crow Books and available from Amazon and other bookstores.
His forthcoming book, Into the Wider Dream will be published Winter/Spring 2015 by White Crow Books.

Paperback               Kindle

Afterlife Teaching from Stephen the Martyr - Michael Cocks


John says that “we” don’t need anything beyond Scripture, blind faith, etc.  Obviously, he assumes that everyone else is in agreement with him, which clearly is not the case.  Otherwise, why would so many people be abandoning religion? 
It’s great that blind faith works for him, but he shouldn’t assume that it is working for most.

Michael Tymn, Thu 30 Oct, 22:08

Two primary factors prevent me from taking ‘beyond the grave’ messages seriously.
One is the idea that we need anything from anyone who has departed this life when with the combination of Scripture, reason, tradition, experience, reflection, analysis, and Christian community on what we know of God, as Creator, redeemer and empower of life gives us all and more than we need for the full wonder of Christian living in this world.
The second is that as with our knowledge of ?God nothing is known for certain beyond our faith and our hope nor can it be and more importantly nor do we need it to be.
I am content to explore the richness of what we have in this life accepting Jesus’ word to the thief “Today you will be with me——-”
John Marcon

John Marcon, Sun 26 Oct, 09:31

Thank you both for your comments. It would be wonderful if the churches as such “offered an afterlife that made sense.” But I think that the best we can hope for is that more and more people in the various churches will accept that view of the afterlife known from experience. Church leaders both in the Catholic and Protestant churches express individualistic and irreconcilable views, and the same will apply to church members. Most people I think, belong to churches for those things that only they can provide, but look elsewhere to further certain aspects of their own spiritual paths.

Michael Cocks, Fri 24 Oct, 13:30

I’m glad to hear that so many are listening, even though it’s not everyone.

Elene Gusch, Fri 24 Oct, 06:47


Well said.  So much misunderstanding is rooted in semantics.  For example, what exactly is a “spiritualist”?  As I see it, anyone not a materialist is a spiritualist.  What else is there?  Either you believe in a spirit world or you don’t.  “God” doesn’t even have to enter the picture in this regard. One can be a spiritualist without believing in God, but then that is also a matter of semantics. God needs to be defined.

If we are talking about the belief system called “Spiritualism” (with a capital “S”)then that narrows it down somewhat.  I believe the primary thing that came out of “Spiritualism” is that the afterlife is not a black and white situation, not the horrific hell and humdrum heaven of orthodox religion.  Spiritualism’s main contribution is that there are many shades of gray in the afterlife and that we gravitate to the level or “shade of gray” that we have prepared ourselves for.  I like Professor Robert Hare’s understanding of it that we each develop a “moral specific gravity” based on our actions and works in this life, and that MSG determines our first abode in the afterlife. 

I believe that this teaching alone, if accepted by orthodox religion, could recapture a large percentage of those who have abandoned their religions.  At least they wouldn’t have left the Church in the first place if the Church had offered an afterlife that made sense.

Michael Tymn, Fri 24 Oct, 06:21

Add your comment



Your comment

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

Please note that all comments are read and approved before they appear on the website

translate this page
The Hidden Door – Introduction by Peter and Elizabeth Fenwick – Accounts of dreams are as old as human history. People have always been fascinated by their own dreams, and have always looked for significance· in them. From the most ancient civilisations of Assyrians and Babylonians through to Biblical times it was believed that dreams brought messages from the gods in the form of warnings, omens and portents. In ancient Greece they were seen as prophecies, or instructions from Zeus. Read here
© White Crow Books | About us | Contact us | Privacy policy | Author submissions | Trade orders