home books e-books audio books recent titles with blogs
“On the Feast of Stephen”

Posted on 26 December 2017, 12:19

On Boxing Day we also celebrate St Stephen’s Day.  Later Stephen talks to us personally and movingly about his martyrdom But first we hear the story as it is told to us in the New Testament.
In the Book of the Acts of the Apostles in Chapter 6 we read

Seven Chosen to Serve

“Now in these days when the disciples were increasing in number, a complaint by the Greek speaking Christians arose against the Hebrew speakers, because their widows were being neglected in the daily distribution. 2 And the twelve apostles summoned the full number of the disciples and said, “It is not right that we should give up preaching the word of God to serve tables. 3 Therefore, brothers, pick out from among you seven men of good repute, full of the Spirit and of wisdom, whom we will appoint to this duty. 4 But we will devote ourselves to prayer and to the ministry of the word.” 5 And what they said pleased the whole gathering, and they chose Stephen, a man full of faith and of the Holy Spirit, and Philip, and Prochorus, and Nicanor, and Timon, and Parmenas, and Nicolaus, a proselyte of Antioch. 6 These they set before the apostles, and they prayed and laid their hands on them
7 And the word of God continued to increase, and the number of the disciples multiplied greatly in Jerusalem, and a great many of the priests became obedient to the faith.

Stephen Is Seized

8 And Stephen, full of grace and power, was doing great wonders and signs among the people. 9 Then some of those who belonged to the synagogue of the Freedmen (as it was called), and of the Cyrenians, and of the Alexandrians, and of those from Cilicia and Asia, rose up and disputed with Stephen. 10 But they could not withstand the wisdom and the Spirit with which he was speaking. 11 Then they secretly instigated men who said, “We have heard him speak blasphemous words against Moses and God.” 12 And they stirred up the people and the elders and the scribes, and they came upon him and seized him and brought him before the council, 13 and they set up false witnesses who said, “This man never ceases to speak words against this holy place and the law, 14 for we have heard him say that this Jesus of Nazareth will destroy this place and will change the customs that Moses delivered to us.” 15 And gazing at him, all who sat in the council saw that his face was like the face of an angel

Stephen speaks boldly in his defence

Stephen was open in describing his teaching to his accusers

. 48 The Most High does not dwell in houses made by hands, [like the Temple in Jerusalem] as the prophet says, 49 “‘Heaven is my throne,    and the earth is my footstool. What kind of house will you build for me, says the Lord,    or what is the place of my rest?

50 Did not my hand make all these things?’51 “You stiff-necked people, uncircumcised in heart and ears, you always resist the Holy Spirit. As your fathers did, so do you. 52 Which of the prophets did your fathers not persecute? And they killed those who announced beforehand the coming of the Righteous One, whom you have now betrayed and murdered, 53 you who received the law as delivered by angels and did not keep it.”

The Stoning of Stephen

54 Now when they heard these things they were enraged, and they ground their teeth at him. 55 But he, full of the Holy Spirit, gazed into heaven and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing at the right hand of God. 56 And he said, “Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God.” 57 But they cried out with a loud voice and stopped their ears and rushed together at him. 58 Then they cast him out of the city and stoned him. And the witnesses laid down their garments at the feet of a young man named Saul. 59 And as they were stoning Stephen, he called out, “Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.” 60 And falling to his knees he cried out with a loud voice, “Lord, do not hold this sin against them.” And when he had said this, he fell asleep

144. Stephen’s own moving words about his childhood and youth:

: Olive has a question. She wishes to know more of Stephen. My answer is that she wishes to understand how and why I feel things, why I might say things, and to whom I might speak; what emotions I might have, if I have any anger, and what my doubts might be. Then perhaps she will understand herself better, and she knows another a little more closely. She might understand then, when she feels despondent, and feels that much is not worth while, when she sees that another has felt this way, has risen above it, and has gained help, and can give help. Then perhaps it might be that the readers of the book that you might write, might also feel this.

Would you know of the times when Stephen was in doubt? When he walked and preached and still he doubted?

Of the great fear, and the knowledge of tragedy that was in Stephen’s heart? Or the tears that Stephen shed for himself? Of the ambitions, as your own, that were unrealised?

Of the terror of death, of the fear of the opinions of others, the ambitions to wealth and fame, of the love of another that Stephen felt? Does this sound unfamiliar to you?
This is how it was for Stephen, a young man, spoken of by his elders. I recall that he was considered untidy, that he showed not the respect for his parents that he might, that he stole as a child foolish things, he gave away what did not belong to him, his taste for music was indifferent, he had many dislikes of the foods that he ate, he would wish for fine horses, but needed to pretend with a mule; he had ambitions of being a great soldier.

We could then count Stephen as failing in many of his ambitions, much to his gain. Stephen did not see success in much that he tried to accomplish. Often his testimony was mistaken. Very seldom was it well received. He had many moments of foolishness, and a great deal of laughter. He was inexpert when he travelled, and often he was unwise in his companionship. This then is Stephen. Is there more that you wish to know?

145. Stephen’s Awareness

Olive: Your awareness now.

Stephen: The awareness that I have is the gift of, and is part of the Father, as are we all. We think perhaps that Stephen is separated and that he is aware of everything in the way that Olive might be aware, or feels that she is aware. But this of course is not so. [It is true that] for a long period of what we might call time, after the death of his body, Stephen was separated, as many still are.
In his so-called separateness, Stephen attempted to be of service to the Father. But then in the course of what we call time, Stephen let go of the personality of Stephen, the tent which the Father had given him in which to be housed. And thus unclothed, he gave up his separateness to be one with the Whole. You will understand that when I speak to you, I re-enter this tent, I put on again the clothes of Stephen, I put on the robes of a saint, in order that you may feel comfortable, in order that you may walk with me in a way that to you is familiar.

Michael:  It makes me feel really scared to hear you talk like this. That this Stephen to whom we talk is only a puppet of personality manipulated by the Whole. It reminds me that I, Michael, would be such a puppet too. I get really scared of losing what is me, what I think of as me, and jumping into the void.

Stephen: Then take the comfort that the Father has given you; accept the security of your tent. Return to the tent that is Michael when you wish. It is there for your use. But as for me, I have left my Stephen behind, and I have life that belongs to the Whole, to the Father. Now I can be present in the lives of a thousand others.

147. More on his martyrdom.

Stephen: After two thousand years you would think that one would give up hope!

Michael: But I would think… oh!...I am just thinking of you as being two thousand years old, although I know that this could be said of us all. But you have felt successful sometimes during those two thousand years?

Stephen: Occasionally I have felt that I have been worthy in a small way of doing the work of the Lord. Even then you may have read of my failure.

Michael: That was very much in my mind at that point. Does the Bible report what happened at the stoning accurately?

Stephen: Quite accurately.

Michael: You… What pain… then… did you feel?

Stephen: Only for a short time was there pain. The Lord is more merciful than you would imagine. That each one, under these circumstances, is taken apart from himself. Even now, should injury come to Thomas’ body he would not feel that… I do not suggest that we injure him, for he must come back!

Michael: Stephen, no questions are coming to my mind.. but feelings are coming into my mind… to my inner self… that I think I am getting the Brother feeling.. I cannot put it better into words.

Stephen: This is how the feeling should be, for we are brothers. I shall depart. Continue with your feeling. Feel thus, when you pray. And bless each of you.

148. Christ speaks about Stephen:

“The task of your servant Stephen is that of messenger and he speaks with great authority. The task of yourselves is the decision as to which way you choose to use those messages. I say this unto you, that if your choice be wise, you will indeed see the fire in my eyes.  You will indeed recognize the feet that are burnished bronze. Wonder not but proceed with courage, for thus far, we are well pleased”.

Michael Cocks edits the journal, The Ground of Faith.
Afterlife Teaching From Stephen the Martyr by Michael Cocks is published by White Crow Books and available from Amazon and other bookstores.

Paperback               Kindle

For more on Stephen go to

Read comments or post one of your own
Stephen the Martyr: The Heavenly Marriage

Posted on 11 December 2017, 14:06

Do bear with me, if you have read this story before.  I’m not trying to prove anything, I’m thinking about ambiguity and levels of understanding of communications from Spirit.

It was the day that Tom and Olive Ashman got married.  Tom was the channel or medium through whom the spirit of St Stephen the Martyr spoke over a period of more than seven years. After the marriage ceremony there was a party.  Wine was consumed but not in excess, (so far as I remember) and a little two year old boy was granted a sip.

That evening we continued socialising at home, and then we thought to invite Stephen to join us. He accepted the invitation, but surprised us by talking in an ancient form of Greek.  I recognised the language, as I had some knowledge of the basics of the Greek of 2000 years ago. It later turned out to be the version spoken in Thrace, and also in Galatia, a province of Asia Minor, now called Turkey. Both regions were dominated by Celtic tribes.

He didn’t explain, but continued in English.  But as everything was being recorded on tape, three of those present were eager to transcribe the sounds very carefully, to see what they might mean.  If you want to know what the actual Greek words were , I go into great detail about that in my book, Afterlife Teaching from Stephen the Martyr.

Our first attempt at translation was, “For the Celt, for the two year old, for the greedy, the Dionysian wines should be diluted.”  [Stephen’s words referred to the festival of the juice of the newly pressed grape celebrated in the Lenes, a suburb of Athens. Non-alcoholic. ] Grape juice should be diluted. How strange!

Reading up about Celts of that area,  we found them often described as drunkards.  Dear, dear!  Stephen was telling us off!  But later, Stephen denied this, say that it had to do with a gathering of friends (not necessarily, I suppose, worse for wear from liquor.) Perhaps one gathering of friends was being compared with another, 2000 years in the past.

Puzzles remained.  Whatever did the Athenian festival of Dionysos or Bacchus, the festival of freshly pressed grapes, have to do with the situation? And why was a native Thracian word, (not Greek), being used? And why on earth did the grape-juice have to be diluted?

About the ambiguities: We consulted two senior specialists in ancient Greek from two New Zealand universities, They both agreed that the strange words genuinely belonged to that Thracian dialect, and were strong indications of the authenticity of the speaker.  One scholar remarked on the ambiguities found in the words.  Ambiguity was the trademark of Delphic oracle.  There is the story of King Croesus who consulted Delphi before attacking Persia, and according to Herodotus was advised: “If you cross the river, a great empire will be destroyed”. Believing the response favourable, Croesus attacked, but it was his own empire that ultimately was destroyed by the Persians.

Accordingly, we may not have been wrong in interpreting Stephen’s words as telling us off for misuse of wine, and for giving it to the two year old.  But the words were ambiguous:  we could also read “two years having passed” instead of “for two year old”, and read“with this grape juice” instead of “For the greedy.”

Stephen did give a further clue: they were words known to Joseph the father of Jesus.  They had been spoken in a totally different context. What that context was we could not guess. He also said that both he and Joseph had been Essenes.

We still had the question: Why on earth should one dilute grape juice?  For the answer to that question we had to wait thirty years,  It took several synchronistic discoveries, the reading of several documents of the Dead Sea Scrolls, and research into what historians and theologians had to say about the Essenes and the early church. 

Many years were to pass before we came to clarity.  We came to the understanding, that Stephen himself had spoken these words in Galilee in the North of Palestine, to Joseph the father of Jesus.  Joseph was leader of an Essene sect called the Nazarenes, and it was a group where families lived together. To join this group a person had to serve a two year period of preparation, called a Novitiate.  When one was about to be accepted into the group, one had to take part in a Messianic Communion service, where grape juice had to be diluted with water.  That was the answer!

Another thing: The word “Messiah” means “anointed with Spirit” “filled with Holy Spirit.”  And “Bacchus” (Roman) “Dionysus”  (Greek) refers to “inspiration from Spirit” as well as having to do with the consumption of wine.  Another ambiguity.

So when Stephen says that the Bacchanalian wines need to be diluted,  he is saying that the grape-juice associated with Dionysus the God of inspiration, needs to be diluted, as in the Essenic Messianic Communion service, for Stephen to be admitted as an Essene.

The Greek words that Stephen spoke to us suggested that there had been a problem about Stephen having been born in Celtic territory, rather than being a true Jew of Israel.  Local Jews regarded Jews who had been born abroad as second-class Jews.  Stephen twice refers to the fact that he had been born in Celtic territory, and his words suggest that even though this had been the case, he might join the Essene Nazarene group of Joseph in Galilee.  In this way Stephen became acquainted with the Holy Family, and became a Greek speaking follower of Jesus at a   later   date.

How much meaning turned out to have been packed into those few words!

(The Essenes had a new wine (unfermented grape juice) festival of their own.  So, why did Stephen refer to the Greek Athenian festival of Dionysus instead of the Essene festival of Israel?  I think probably because Stephen was a Greek speaker, and he saw the two festivals as having the same meaning.)

It all turns out to be a fascinating glimpse into the beginnings of Christianity.

Yes,  Stephen’s Greek words provide powerful evidence that we are truly hearing from the Spirit of Stephen the Martyr.  But they also provide the insights that I have just been describing.

We also can reflect on the process by which we heard the words, and by which we came to so many insights about them as the years passed by. 

In the first case we have learned that it is possible for a spirit to communicate to us through the personality that was alive 2000 years ago, with clear recall and much wisdom.

But it is much more the case than Stephen using Tom Ashman as a kind of telephone.  His Greek words would have been meaningless, without one person present who understood basic Greek. Nothing would have happened if three people in the group had not spent much time making sure that the sounds had been heard correctly. Nothing would have happened if numbers of synchronicities had not occurred to guide us to deeper meaning.  Reference books had to be consulted, specialists in ancient dialectical Greek, history books, books on theology.

When Spirit communicates,  expect much more than x=a. Expect depth of meaning within depth of meaning.

Another example was a dream that I have described elsewhere:: in the dream there were two aspects of me inside my skull. The physical me stood behind the left eye had an altar before me (I am an Anglican priest.) My bloodied priestly robes fell to the sand on the ground.  My spiritual self stood behind the right eye, waiting for music from heaven.. My spiritual self had no robes, but was clothed in liver.

Liver!  How strange! For some reason I wondered what the Hebrew word was for liver.  I looked it up in the Hebrew lexicon. It was kabod.  But the word had another meaning. It meant glory. Not meaning flashiness and high esteem as it does in Greek, It meant rather, the whole weight of the attributes of God.

What did the church lectionary have me to preach about the following Sunday? It was “Christ clothed with glory” So my dream was about my sermon to be?  Not entirely.  Because that morning I read a news item about a Canadian exhibition where a woman stood clothed not in liver but steaks stitched together.

Spiritual communications are almost never statements like a=b.  They are often ambiguous, and can often involve the height and depth, and the length and width of reality. Deeps within deeps.

Michael Cocks edits the journal, The Ground of Faith.
Afterlife Teaching From Stephen the Martyr by Michael Cocks is published by White Crow Books and available from Amazon and other bookstores.

Paperback               Kindle

For more on Stephen go to

Read comments or post one of your own
translate this page
After a Suicide by Sylvia Hart Wright – Now Rita's a very spiritual woman, very religious, and this kind of thing has happened to her a lot. She finally decided she's not crazy, she just sees people after they've died. What she does in response is she prays for them. So she was telling me, "Laura, I really think Dave needs our prayers. I think he's stuck." And that word jumped into my head. I'd completely forgotten my nightmare but that word "stuck" jumped in my head and it really disturbed me. Read here
© White Crow Books | About us | Contact us | Privacy policy | Author submissions | Trade orders